It’s the culturomics, stupid

The Internet Archive is pretty awesome. But the Google Ngrams tool, which allows anyone to search millions of books from 1800 to 2008, is pretty neat too. This tool is part of a new field called “culturomics” which is the study of historical trends by quantitatively analyzing words from a very large digital data set, like Google Books. (Ironically, if you do an Ngram search for culturomics you get an error message since it hasn’t entered the corpus of digitized books yet.) Culturomics has led to some cool discoveries, especially related to the development of the modern English lexicon. Here’s how it works, in graphic form:

Steps for Ngram (and similar culturomic tools): 1) Books are written 2) Google scans books 3) Ngram analyzes selection 4) user searches

Steps for Ngram :
1) Books are written 2) Google scans books 3) Ngram analyzes selection of books 4) User searches for specific words

Personally, I found most fascinating the ability of culturomics to predict, retroactively at least, the location of Osama Bin Laden to within 200 kilometers of his eventual hideout in Abbottabad. Using mentions of Bin Laden in Summary of World Broadcasts, which tracks global news outlets, researchers realized that the two cities “identified” closest with Bin Laden were Islamabad and Peshawar. Lo and behold, Abbottabad is within 200 kilometers of both cities.

Geotagged mentions from 1979–April 2011 mentioning “bin Laden”. They “converge” in north Pakistan where bin Laden was found in May 2011.

But as Patricia Cohen wrote in her New York Times article when the Ngram too was first released, this groundbreaking historical research tool was not without its initial detractors. There are two main complaints from traditional historians: 1) only academics from the sciences, and not the humanities, were part of the initial research and study; 2) this tool doesn’t allow for close readings or interpretation (as Elena Razlogova describes it “today builders of digital tools and archives herald a non-interpretive, ‘post-theoretical age'”).

I think those complaints are missing the point. This tool, like so many other digital resources, is not about replacing traditional historical approaches, but is about giving historians and other “humanists” supplementary tools that are only now possible thanks to the power of the internet. As one of the creators of the Ngram project said “I don’t want humanists to accept any specific claims — we’re just throwing a lot of interesting pieces on the table.” So unlike quantitative history, which has more or less faded out as a historical method, I believe this tool is here to stay.

(Up next: creating an actual chart using Ngram!)


Tags: , , , , , ,

About Zach Klitzman

A History Grad student at American University

3 responses to “It’s the culturomics, stupid”

  1. db7136a says :

    I definitely agree with your post. In fact, my post this week was also about encouraging folks in the humanities (particularly historians) to jump on board. But for me the question is how do we encourage it? I suggested that we demystify how it works. But that may not be enough. What do you think it’ll take?

  2. drdankerr says :

    Interesting post — it would appear culturomics does not appear by definition — the data sets used here were created before the term by the very people who coined the term. I agree with you about the use of visualizations – and I don;t think Elena Razlogova would disgagree entirely. Her point, akin to Howard Zinn’s point, is what is it we are focusing on?

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Final Resting Place | Zach's AU History Blog - May 1, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

The Junto

A Group Blog on Early American History

Back to the Future!

Musings on history in the 21st century.

You're History

Caitlyn Sellar, History & New Media, Spring 2014

Public Historian Under Construction

AU grad student blogging about history and new media

Becoming a Public Historian

Sydney Rhodes, Public Historian

Historian Who Prefers Paper

History and New Media blogs from an old school historian

Alex Goes Digital

Online Musings of a Public Historian

Public History in the Digital Realm

By Lisa Fthenakis, a public history grad student


the ramblings of a public historian

Joanna Dressel

thoughts on the future of history, from my history and new media class, spring 2014 semester

After Analog

pondering the digital side of public history

The Blog

The latest news on and the WordPress community.

The Past and other mind puzzles...

history & new media intersections


One grad student's thoughts on digital history, new media, and the public

The Daily Post

The Art and Craft of Blogging

%d bloggers like this: